logo_slogan_bw_med

 

English Language Learner: Methods & Materials

 

Instructor Name:          Dr. Karen Lea

Phone:                         509-891-7219

Office Hours:               8 a.m. to 5 p.m. PST Monday - Friday

Email:                          karen_lea@virtualeduc.com

Address:                      Virtual Education Software

                                    16201 E Indiana Ave, Suite 1450

                                    Spokane, WA 99216

Technical Support:       support@virtualeduc.com

                                                                                                                                                                                   

English Language Learner: Methods & Materials was written to help teachers understand concepts and terms related to educating students whose first language is not English. This course discusses how to apply instructional methods in creating lessons; how to create a motivating and caring learning environment; how to integrate teaching reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills; how to differentiate instruction for English language learners; and how to identify culturally appropriate curriculum and instructional resources.

 

This computer-based instruction course is a self-supporting program that provides instruction, structured practice, and evaluation all on your home or school computer.  Technical support information can be found in the Help section of your course.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Course Materials (Online)

Title:                English Language Learner: Methods & Materials

Instructor:       Dr. Karen Lea

Publisher:        Virtual Education Software, inc. 2019

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Academic Integrity Statement

The structure and format of most distance-learning courses presume a high level of personal and academic integrity in completion and submission of coursework. Individuals enrolled in a distance-learning course are expected to adhere to the following standards of academic conduct.

 

Academic Work

Academic work submitted by the individual (such as papers, assignments, reports, tests) shall be the student’s own work or appropriately attributed, in part or in whole, to its correct source. Submission of commercially prepared (or group prepared) materials as if they are one’s own work is unacceptable.

 

Aiding Honesty in Others

The individual will encourage honesty in others by refraining from providing materials or information to another person with knowledge that these materials or information will be used improperly.

 

Violation of these academic standards will result in the assignment of a failing grade and subsequent loss of credit for the course.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Level of Application

This course is designed as an informational course for K–12 teachers, administrators, parents, and related service personnel. Information discussed is designed to help you better understand second language acquisition and current educational models being used to educate English language learners. This course will allow you to compare and identify how school districts in your own area are implementing English language learning programs and handling current issues, along with some of the practices teachers are using to educate students and communicate with parents/guardians. 

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Expected Learning Outcomes

As a result of taking this course, participants will be able to demonstrate their ability to:

1. Apply instructional methods in creating lessons

2. Create a motivating and caring learning environment

3. Create standards-based lessons

4. Integrate the teaching of reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills

5. Differentiate instruction for English language learners

6. Identify culturally appropriate curriculum and instructional resources

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Course Description

Information provided in this course has been divided into four chapters, which should be completed in the order in which they are presented in the program. Once you have completed these four chapters, you should have a better understanding of the methods and materials for teaching English language learners. You are strongly encouraged to read additional journal articles, books, and research materials outside the course material to gain a better understanding of current issues related to educating students who are learning English as a second language.

 

Chapter 1: English Language Learners

This chapter focuses on who English language learners are and instructional methods that research tells us work best with individuals who are learning a second language, learning academic content, and perhaps also continuing to learn their native language at home and in the community.

 

Chapter 2: Instructional Strategies

Chapter 2 focuses on instructional methods and theories for teaching individuals who are learning English as a second language.

 

Chapter 3: Methods

This chapter focuses on specific strategies/methods for teaching reading, writing, speaking, and listening when teaching individuals who are learning English as a second language.

 

Chapter 4: Choosing Cultural Materials

Chapter four focuses on how to choose and create culturally sensitive classroom and/or school materials.

 

                                                                                                                                                                       

Student Expectations

As a student you will be expected to:

·         Complete all four information sections showing a competent understanding of the material presented in each section.

·         Complete all four section examinations, showing a competent understanding of the material presented.  You must obtain an overall score of 70% or higher, with no individual exam score below 50%, and successfully complete ALL writing assignments to pass this course. *Please note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university; therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your minimum exam score requirements are.

·         Complete a review of any section on which your examination score was below 50%.

·         Retake any examination, after completing an information review, to increase that examination score to a minimum of 50%, making sure to also be achieving an overall exam score of a minimum 70% (maximum of three attempts). *Please note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university; therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your minimum exam score requirements are.

·         Complete all course journal article and essay writing assignments with the minimum word count shown for each writing assignment.

·         Complete a course evaluation form at the end of the course.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Examinations

            At the end of each course section, you will be expected to complete an examination designed to assess your knowledge. You may take these exams a total of three times. Your last score will save, not the highest score.  After your third attempt, each examination will lock and not allow further access.  The average from your exam scores will be printed on your certificate.  However, this is not your final grade since your required writing assignments have not been reviewed.  Exceptionally written or poorly written required writing assignments, or violation of the academic integrity policy in the course syllabus, will affect your grade.  As this is a self-paced computerized instruction program, you may review course information as often as necessary. You will not be able to exit any examinations until you have answered all questions. If you try to exit the exam before you complete all questions, your information will be lost. You are expected to complete the entire exam in one sitting.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Writing Assignments

All assignments are reviewed and may impact your final grade.  Exceptionally or poorly written assignments, or violation of the Academic Integrity Policy (see course syllabus for policy), will affect your grade. Fifty percent of your grade is determined by your writing assignments, and your overall exam score determines the other fifty percent.  Refer to the Essay Grading Guidelines which were sent as an attachment with your original course link. You should also refer to the Course Syllabus Addendum which was sent as an attachment with your original course link, to determine if you have any writing assignments in addition to the Critical Thinking Questions (CTQ) and Journal Article Summations (JAS).  If you do, the Essay Grading Guidelines will also apply.

 

Your writing assignments must meet the minimum word count and are not to include the question or your final citations as part of your word count.  In other words, the question and citations are not to be used as a means to meet the minimum word count.

 

Critical Thinking Questions

There are four CTQs that you are required to complete. You will need to write a minimum of 500 words (maximum 1,000) per essay. You should explain how the information that you gained from the course will be applied and clearly convey a strong understanding of the course content as it relates to each CTQ.   To view the questions, click on REQUIRED ESSAY and choose the CTQ that you are ready to complete; this will bring up a screen where you may enter your essay.  Prior to course submission, you may go back at any point to edit your essay, but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits.

 

You must click SAVE before you write another essay or move on to another part of the course.

Journal Article Summations

You are required to write, in your own words, a summary on a total of three peer-reviewed or scholarly journal articles (one article per JAS), written by an author with a Ph.D., Ed.D. or similar, on the topic outlined within each JAS section in the “Required Essays” portion of the course  (blogs, abstracts, news articles or similar are not acceptable). Your article choice must relate specifically to the discussion topic listed in each individual JAS. You will choose a total of three relevant articles (one article per JAS) and write a thorough summary of the information presented in each article (you must write a minimum of 200 words with a 400-word maximum per JAS). Be sure to provide the URL or the journal name, volume, date, and any other critical information to allow the facilitator to access and review each article. 

 

To write your summary, click on REQUIRED ESSAYS and choose the JAS that you would like to complete. A writing program will automatically launch where you can write your summary. When you are ready to stop, click SAVE. Prior to course submission you may go back at any point to edit your summaries, but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits. For more information on the features of this assignment, please consult the HELP menu.

 

You must click SAVE before you write another summary or move on to another part of the course.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Instructor Description

Karen Lea holds a Ph.D. in education. Dr. Lea has fifteen years’ experience teaching at the K-12 level and another fourteen years’ experience teaching education courses at the undergraduate and post-graduate level. Currently she is an Assessment Developer at Western Governor's University. Dr. Lea has been professionally published over fifteen times and has served on over a dozen panels and boards, including serving on the NCATE (CAEP) Board of Examiners.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Contacting the Instructor

You may contact the instructor by emailing karen_lea@virtualeduc.com or by calling (509) 891-7219 Monday through Friday. Calls made during office hours will be answered within 24 hours. Phone conferences will be limited to ten minutes per student, per day, given that this is a self-paced instructional program. Please do not contact the instructor about technical problems, course glitches, or other issues that involve the operation of the course.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

Technical Questions

If you have questions or problems related to the operation of this course, please try everything twice. If the problem persists, please check our support pages for FAQs and known issues at www.virtualeduc.com and also the Help section of your course.

 

If you need personal assistance, email support@virtualeduc.com or call (509) 891-7219.  When contacting technical support, please know your course version number (it is located at the bottom left side of the Welcome Screen) and your operating system, and be seated in front of the computer at the time of your call. 

                                                        

Minimum Computer Requirements

Please refer to VESi’s website: www.virtualeduc.com or contact VESi if you have further questions about the compatibility of your operating system.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

 

Refer to the addendum regarding Grading Criteria, Course Completion Information, Items to be Submitted and how to submit your completed information. The addendum will also note any additional course assignments that you may be required to complete that are not listed in this syllabus.

                                                                                                                                                                                   

 

Bibliography (Suggested reading)

Aceves, T. C., & Orosco, M. J. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching (Document No. IC-2). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/

Alber, R. (2010). Doing it differently: Tips for teaching vocabulary. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/vocabulary-instruction-teaching-tips-rebecca-alber

Alharbi, A. (2015). Building vocabulary for language learning: Approach for ESL learners to study new vocabulary. Journal of International Students, 5(4), 501–511.

Alvior, M. G. (2015). How to use the grammar translation method. SimplyEducateMe. Retrieved from http://simplyeducate.me/2015/01/10/how-to-use-the-grammar-translation-method/

American Federation of Teachers. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/essa_ells.pdf

Archer, A., & Hughes, C. (2011). Explicit Instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford.

Arnold, J., & Murphey, T. (2013). Meaningful action: Earl Stevick’s influence on language teaching. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Arulselvi, E. (2014). Teaching pronunciation of English through Silent way. The ELT Practitioner, 1(3). Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/theeltpractitioner/archive/volume-i-number-iii/6-silent-way

Atasheneh, N., & Naeimi, M. (2015). Vocabulary learning through using Mechanical Techniques Vocabulary Learning Strategy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 541–548. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011

Baker, M. (2010). Music moves brain to pay attention, Stanford study finds. Stanford Medicine. Retrieved from https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2007/07/music-moves-brain-to-pay-attention-stanford-study-finds.html

Beare, K. (2017). Suggestopedia – Lesson plan. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/suggestopedia-lesson-plan-1211080

Beare, K. (2014). The challenge of teaching listening skills. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/challenge-of-teaching-listening-skills-1209064

Biedron, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). New conceptualizations of linguistic giftedness. Language Teaching, 49(2), 151–185. doi:10.1017/S0261444815000439

Bowen, T. (2017). Teaching approaches: Total physical response. One Stop English. Retrieved from http://www.onestopenglish.com/methodology/methodology/teaching-approaches/teaching-approaches-total-physical-response/146503.article

Bowen, T. (2016). Teaching approaches: What is suggestopedia? One Stop English. Retrieved from http://www.onestopenglish.com/methodology/methodology/teaching-approaches/teaching-approaches-what-is-suggestopedia/146499.article

Bowen, T. (2016). Teaching approaches: The communicative classroom. One Stop English. Retrieved from http://www.onestopenglish.com/methodology/methodology/teaching-approaches/teaching-approaches-the-communicative-classroom/146489.article

Breiseth, L. (2016). Reading comprehension strategies for English language learners. ASCD Express. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ascd-express/vol5/511-breiseth.aspx

Brigham Young University. (2016). The audiolingual method. Retrieved from http://hlr.byu.edu/methods/content/text/audio-lingual-text.htm

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32. Retrieved from https://esci310-civicscienceeducation.wikispaces.com/file/view/The+Act+of+Discovery-Bruner.pdf

Bullard, J. (2010). Creating environments for learning: Birth to age 8. New York, NY: Pearson.

Burr, E., Haas, E., & Ferriere, K. (2015). Identifying and supporting English learner students with learning disabilities: Key issues in the literature and state practice (REL 2015–086). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West.

Boche, B., & Henning, M. (2014). Multimodal scaffolding in the secondary English classroom curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(7), 579–590. doi:10.1002/jaal.406

Cal Digest. (1993). Communicative language teaching: An introduction and sample activities. Retrieved from http://cmmr.usc.edu/FullText/Galloway_ComLangTeach_IntroActivities.pdf

CAELA. (2016). Activities to promote interaction and communication. Center for English Learners. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/tools/program_development/elltoolkit/Part2-41Interaction&Communication.pdf

Calderon, M., Salvin, R., & Sanchez, M. (2011). Effective instruction for English learners. Future Child, 21(1) 103–129. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21465857

Changing Minds. (2017). Stereotypes. Retrieved from http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/stereotypes.htm

Chen, Z. (2016). Grammar learning strategies applied to ESP teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(3), 617–621. doi:10.17507/tpls.0603.23

Chung, S. (2017). A communicative approach to teaching grammar: Theory and practice. The English Teacher, 34, 33–50. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.7471&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Delisle, J. (2016). Characteristics of gifted ELLS. Gifted English Language Learners. Retrieved from https://ssiathomas.wordpress.com/about/

Dumais, T. (2014). How to help children speak English with confidence. British Council Voices. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/how-help-children-speak-english-confidence

Edmentum. (2017). 9 strategies to differentiate instruction for ELL students. Retrieved from http://www.edmentum.com/sites/edmentum.com/files/resource/media/0272-27_DifferentiateInstructionESL_081415.pdf

ESL Awareness. (2017). Theories of motivation and ESL students. Retrieved from https://diversitygroup-esl.wikispaces.com/Theories+of+Motivation+and+ESL+Students

Feist, M. (2016). My journey working with ELLs. Colorin Colorado! Retrieved from http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/meeting-students-where-they-are

Ford, K. (2017). Differentiated instruction for English language learners. Colorin Colorado! Retrieved from http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/differentiated-instruction-english-language-learners

Gándara, P. (2015). The implications of deeper learning for adolescent immigrants and English language learners. Students at the center: Deeper learning research series. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.

Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.wou.edu/~kaguzman11/curi12002.pdf

Gilakjani, A. P. (2016). The significance of listening comprehension in English language teaching. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(8), 1670–1677. doi:10.17507/tpls.0608.22

Goldenberg, C. (2013). Unlocking the research on English learners: What we know and don’t yet know about effective instruction. American Educator, 4–32. Retrieved from https://www.aft.org/periodical/american-educator/summer-2013/unlocking-research-english-learners

Gopang, I. B., Bughio, F. A. Memon, S. A. (2016). Foreign language anxiety and learner beliefs in second language learning: A research timeline. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(8), 1591–1595. doi:10.17507/tpls.0608.10

Gordon, J. (2017). Language experience approach (LEA). Illinois Resource Center. Retrieved from https://www.dentonisd.org/cms/lib/TX21000245/Centricity/Domain/55/ThelanguageExphandout.pdf

Great Schools. (2013). English language learner. Education Reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/english-language-learner/

Greenfader, C. M., & Broillette, L. (2013). Boosting language skills of English learners through dramatization and movement. The Reading Teacher, 67(3), 171–180. doi:10.1002/TRTR.1192

Hagan, E. C. (n.d.). Response to Intervention: Implications for Spanish-speaking English language learners. Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/diversity/response-to-intervention-implications-for-spanish-speaking-english-language-learners

Hakuta, K., & Santos, M. (2012). Understanding language: Language, literacy, and learning in the content areas. Stanford University.

Hall, G., & Guy, C. (2012). Own-language use in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 45(3), 271–308. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000067

Hazrat, M., & Hessamy, G. (2013). The impact of two types of vocabulary preparation on listening comprehension, vocabulary learning, and vocabulary learning strategy use. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1453–1461. doi:10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002

He, Y., Vetter, A., & Fairbanks, C. (2014). Reframing literacy practices for culturally and linguistically diverse students in U.S. schools. English Education, 46(4), 326–344.

Heinz, M. (2013). A preliminary survey of the preferred learning methods for interpretation students. Journal of International Education Research, 9(4), 293–305. doi:10.19030/jier.v9i4.8081

Herman, R. E. (2015). Mainstream teachers and the Response to Intervention process for English language learners School of Education Student Capstones and Dissertations. 114.

Hoch, F. (2017). Writing and English as a second language. Learn NC. Retrieved from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/672

Hoover, R. (2016). Noticing the extraordinary: Issues related to identifying the gifted English language learners and strategies for educators to support them. Ursidae: The Undergraduate Research Journal at the University of Northern Colorado, 6(1), Article 5.

Herta, M. E. S. (2012). Guiding biliteracy development: Appropriating cross-linguistic and conceptual knowledge to sustain second-language reading comprehension. Bilingual Research Journal, 35(2), 179–196. doi:10.1080/15235882.2012.703638

Jenkins, B. (2012). Implicit vs. explicit instruction: Which is better for word learning? Scientific Learning. Retrieved from http://www.scilearn.com/blog/implicit-vs-explicit-instruction-word-learning

Jimenez, A. (2017). Meeting students where they are. Colorin Colorado! Retrieved from http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/meeting-students-where-they-are

Joshkiedan. (2017). The Direct Method of teaching English: Ideas, explanations and sample lessons. FluentU. Retrieved from http://www.fluentu.com/english/educator/blog/direct-method-of-teaching-english/

Kame’enui, E. J., Carnine, D. W., Dixon, R. C., Simmons, D. C., & Coyne, M. D. (2002). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Kaur, K. (2014). Young learners’ metacognitive knowledge of listening comprehension and pedagogical recommendations for the teaching of listening. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching and Research, 3(2), 231–244, 247.

Kayi, H. (2016). Teaching speaking: Activities to promote speaking in a second language. The Internet TESL Journal, 12(11). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kayi-TeachingSpeaking.html

Kenneyville Elementary School District 20 Faculty ELL/Bilingual Committee. (2012, July). Sheltered instruction observation protocol (SIOP) strategy guide for ELL/Bilingual learners. Retrieved from http://www.esd20.org/assets/1/6/SIOP_Classroom_Stragtegies.pdf

Kim, I. (2014). Prototypical content development and evaluation of the cognitive English vocabulary-learning program for Korean University students. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 9(1), 49–65. doi:10.1080/18334105.2014.11082019

Klingner, J., & Eppollito, A. M. (2014). English language learners: Differentiating between language acquisition and learning disabilities. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Kolke, D., & Lacorte, M. (2014). Toward intercultural competence: From questions to perspectives and practices of the target culture. Journal of Spanish Language and Teaching, 1, 15–30. doi:10.1080/23247797.2014.898497

Krings, M. (2017). English-language learners may be over-represented in learning disabilities category. PhysOrg. Retrieved from https://phys.org/news/2017-02-english-language-learners-over-represented-disabilities-category.html

Kung, H., Lee, C.-Y., & Jiaoyu, S. (2016). Factors influencing junior high school students’ English language achievement in Taiwan: A Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological System approach. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 29(1), 35–66. Retrieved from http://jepr.ntue.edu.tw/contents/list/detial.asp?id=117

Larkin, M. J. (2016). Providing support for student independence through scaffolded instruction. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 34(1), 30–34. doi:10.1177/004005990103400104

Lee, J., & Heinz, M. (2016). English language learning strategies reported by advanced language learners. Journal of International Education Research, 12(2), 67–78. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096670.pdf

Lesaux, N. K., & Harris, J. R. (2016). Vocabulary learning to enhance reading for understanding. T2% Targeting the 2 Percent University of Texas Briefs. Texas: Texas Education Agency.

Lestari, P., & Rahma, R. A. (2011, June 12). Direct method as one of language teaching approaches. Retrieved from https://novaekasari09.wordpress.com/2011/06/12/direct-method-as-one-of-language-teaching-approaches/

Li, Q. (2014). Integration of cultural teaching into cultivating college learners’ communicative competence.  Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(3), 562–567. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.3.562-567

Liao, S. (2016). Listening strategies and applications in EFL classroom. Retrieved from http://english.tyhs.edu.tw/attachs/6449764001.pdf?display=inline

Luo, X, & Gao, J. (2012). On the existing status in listening teaching and some suggestions for it. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1270–1275. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1270-1275

Manurung, K. (2017). Implementing interest based instructional materials to minimize EFL learners’ speaking skills de-motivating factors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(5), 356–365. Retrieved from http://www.academypublication.com/ojs/index.php/tpls/article/view/tpls0705356365

Markova, I. (2016). Effects of academic and non-academic instructional approaches on preschool English language learners’ classroom engagement and English language development. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(4), 1–20. doi:10.1177/1476718X15609390

Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic achievement: Research on what works in schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Mendler, A. (2013). Teaching your students how to have a conversation. Edutopia. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/teaching-your-students-conversation-allen-mendler

Mora, L. (2017). Classroom environment for ELL students. Retrieved from http://tsolclassroomenvironment.weebly.com/explicit-instruction.html

Morozova. Y. (2014). Methods of enhancing speaking skills of elementary level students. Translation Journal. Retrieved from http://translationjournal.net/journal/63learning.htm

National Association of Gifted Children. (2016). Traits of giftedness. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/my-child-gifted/common-characteristics-gifted-individuals/traits

National Council of Teachers of English. (2016). Common content area roots and affixes. WriteThink. Retrieved from http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/printouts/common-content-area-roots-30842.html

New York City Schools. (2015). Distinguishing language acquisition from learning disabilities. Retrieved from http://engage.ok.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Distinguishing-Language-Acquisition-from-Learning-Disabilities.pdf

Ortiz, A. (2001). English language learners with special needs: Effective instructional strategies. LDOnline. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/5622/

Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. (2012). Stages of reading development. Retrieved from http://www.readingrockets.org/article/stages-reading-development

Paul, A. M. (2016). Where bias begins: The truth about stereotypes. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199805/where-bias-begins-the-truth-about-stereotypes

Pereira, N., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2015). Meeting the linguistic needs of high-potential English language learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(4), 208–215. doi:10.1177/0040059915569362

Pesce, C. (2016). 7 infallible tricks to help ESL students remember new vocabulary. Busy Teacher. Retrieved from http://busyteacher.org/13961-help-esl-students-remember-new-vocabulary.html

Pesce, C. (2016). Help your ESL students improve their listening skills. Busy Teacher. Retrieved from http://busyteacher.org/14777-7-listening-ideas-that-really-work.html

Reed, B., & Railsback, J. (2003). Strategies and resources for mainstream teachers of English language learners. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Rinaldi, C., Ortiz, S. O., & Gamm, S. (2017). Considerations for English language learners. Retrieved from http://rtinetwork.org/getstarted/sld-identification-toolkit/ld-identification-toolkit-considerations-for-ell

Robertson, K. (2017). Reading 101 for English language learners. Colorin Colorado! Retrieved from http://www.colorincolorado.org/article/reading-101-english-language-learners

Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. London, UK: Constable.

Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. London, UK: Constable.

RTINetwork. (2016). RTI based SLD Identification Toolkit. Retrieved from http://rtinetwork.org/getstarted/sld-identification-toolkit/ld-identification-toolkit-considerations-for-ell

Sadker, D. (2016). Some practical ideas for confronting curricular bias. Retrieved from http://www.sadker.org/curricularbias.html

Saeed, K. M., Khaksar, M., Eng, L. S., & Ghani, M.A. (2016). The role of learner-learner interaction in the development of speaking skills. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 235–241. doi:10.17507/tpls.0602.03

Sanchez, C. (2016, April 12). The rare district that recognizes gifted Latino students. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/03/31/472528190/the-rare-district-that-recognizes-gifted-latino-students

SchifferDanoff, V. (2016). Teaching ELL: Reading and writing strategies. Scholastic. Retrieved from https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teaching-content/teaching-ell-reading-and-writing-strategies/

Schneider, S. (1976). Revolution, reaction or reform? The 1974 Bilingual Education Act. New York, NY: Las Americas.

Soames, C. (2017). Using Realia in the classroom. ESL Teachers Board. Retrieved from http://www.eslteachersboard.com/cgi-bin/lessons/index.pl?read=4488

Soares De Sousa, D. (2011). Learning to read in English: Comparing monolingual English and bilingual Zulu-English grade 3 learners. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 1(1), 1–20. doi:10.4102/sajce.v1i1.70}

Sousa, D. (2017). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Stapa, S. H., & Majid, A. H. A. (2012). The use of first language in developing ideas in second language writing. American Journal of Social Issues and Humanities, 2(3), 148–151. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.686.8971&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Tabata-Sandom, M. (2017). L2 Japanese learners’ responses to translation, speed reading, and pleasure reading as a form of extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29(1), 113–132. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2017/articles/tabata-sandom.pdf

Taber, J. (2017). A brief history of ESL instruction, theories, methodologies, and upheavals. Retrieved from http://seattlecentral.edu/faculty/jgeorg/TESLSCCC/ABriefHistory.htm

Taylor, M. (1992). The language experience approach and adult learners. Center for Adult English Language Acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/LEA.html

Teaching English. (2016). TPR. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/total-physical-response-tpr

TEAL Center. (2010). Metacognitive processes. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Available at http://teal.ed.gov

TESOL. (2016). How can teachers teach listening? ELTD. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/docs/books/bk_ELTD_Listening_004

Tindall, E., & Nisbet, D. (2010). Exploring the essential components of reading. Journal of Adult Education, 39(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ891080.pdf

Tolerance. (2017). Culturally responsive curriculum at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.tolerance.org/toolkit/culturally-responsive-curriculum-glance

Triplett, C. (2015). TESOL releases statement on Every Student Succeeds Act. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/news-landing-page/2015/12/04/tesol-releases-statement-on-every-student-succeeds-act

Understanding Language District Engagement Subcommittee at Stanford University. (2013). Understanding language. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu/content/six-key-principles-ell-instruction

U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition. (2016). English learner tool kit (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Educational services for immigrant children and those recently arrived in the United States. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/rights/guid/unaccompanied-children.html

Vaughn, S. (2017). Response to intervention in reading for English language learners. Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/diversity/englishlanguagelearners

Walker, T. (2016). Educators call attention to racist stereotypes in textbooks, impact on students. NEA Today. Retrieved from http://neatoday.org/2016/07/28/racism-in-textbooks/

Wang, W. (2016). Learning to listen: The impact of a metacognitive approach to listening instruction. Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 79–88. doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0235-4

Wong, A. (2015). History class and the fictions about race in America. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/10/the-history-class-dilemma/411601/

Zhou, G., & Nui, X. (2015). Approaches to language teaching and learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 798–802. doi:10.17507/jltr.0604.11

Course content is updated every three years. Due to this update timeline, some URL links may no longer be active or may have changed. Please type the title of the organization into the command line of any Internet browser search window and you will be able to find whether the URL link is still active or any new link to the corresponding organization's web home page.

3/28/19  JN