Early Childhood: Program Planning
Instructor Name: Dr. Marrea Winnega
Facilitator Name: Aumony Dahl, M.Ed.
Office Hours: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. PST Monday – Friday
Address: Virtual Education Software
16201 E Indiana Ave, Suite 1450
Spokane, WA 99216
Technical Support: email@example.com
Welcome to Early Childhood: Program Planning, an interactive distance learning course designed to give you a new perspective on planning and implementing developmentally appropriate practices for young children from birth through age eight. In this course you will learn what is meant by curriculum, assessment, evaluation, and program planning as these terms apply to early childhood education. We will discuss several historical perspectives and theories on child development and examine best practice for early childhood education. We will also examine key concepts and specific activities for teaching various curricular content areas, including language and literacy, mathematics and science, and the expressive arts.
This computer-based instruction course is a self-supporting program that provides instruction, structured practice, and evaluation all on your home or school computer. Technical support information can be found in the Help section of your course.
Title: Early Childhood: Program Planning
Instructor Name: Dr. Marrea Winnega
Facilitator Name: Aumony Dahl, M.Ed.
Publisher: Virtual Education Software, inc. 2008, Revised 2012, Revised 2015, Revised 2018, Revised 2021
The structure and format of most distance-learning courses presume a high level of personal and academic integrity in completion and submission of coursework. Individuals enrolled in a distance-learning course are expected to adhere to the following standards of academic conduct.
Academic work submitted by the individual (such as papers, assignments, reports, tests) shall be the student’s own work or appropriately attributed, in part or in whole, to its correct source. Submission of commercially prepared (or group prepared) materials as if they are one’s own work is unacceptable.
The individual will encourage honesty in others by refraining from providing materials or information to another person with knowledge that these materials or information will be used improperly.
Violations of these academic standards will result in the assignment of a failing grade and subsequent loss of credit for the course.
This course is designed as one of a five-part series on early childhood education. Upon completion of the five-course series you will have covered most competencies found in a Child Development Associates (CDA) program, however, completion of all five courses does not earn participants a CDA unless they are formally enrolled in a program that recognizes these courses within that program. This course specifically covers competencies 1–9, 12, and 13 (it is recommended you check on individual state competencies), which all relate to the establishment of well-run, purposeful programs for young children that are responsive to individual needs and advance the development of the whole child. This course also incorporates the applicable Division for Early Childhood (DEC) Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education, in addition to the newest National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Accreditation Standards (2018), and the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which was signed into law on December 10, 2015. ESSA both sustains and expands the nation’s investment in increasing access to high-quality early childhood education for all children. This course is designed for anyone who plans programs for young children: child-care providers, early childhood educators, and healthcare or social services providers, to name a few.
As a result of this course, participants will demonstrate their ability to:
· Identify the general guidelines for early childhood curriculum, assessment, and evaluation as presented by NAEYC.
· Explain the key components of a developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) for young children.
· Discuss numerous ways to make adaptations, accommodations, and modifications for students with special learning needs.
· Explain the three principles for learning presented by the National Research Council (1999) that directly apply to classroom teaching for children of all ages.
· Discuss research-based positions and standards for various curricular content areas.
· Identify and plan key components of an integrated early childhood curriculum that fosters curiosity and promotes the process of inquiry.
· Describe a variety of ways to integrate language and literacy, mathematics and science, and social studies and expressive arts activities in meaningful ways throughout the early childhood curriculum.
· Provide the most current requirements for earning a CDA Credential or NAEYC Accreditation.
This course, Program Planning, has been divided into four chapters. It discusses numerous considerations for planning and implementing a comprehensive, research-based curriculum for young children. Included will be topics such as Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Understanding by Design (UbD), differentiated instruction, and the use of developmentally appropriate technology for young children. Various perspectives on the history and theory behind early childhood education and child development will be examined, in addition to discussing various forms of diversity among children. We will also discuss what curriculum is, and identify guidelines presented by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) for appropriate curriculum for young children through eight years of age. We will take an overall look at the basic steps for creating an appropriate curriculum, planning a daily schedule, and creating lesson plans and activities for early childhood programs. In addition to focusing our attention on appropriate curricular approaches, we will touch briefly on several curricular approaches to avoid.
While the first chapter of the course provides an overview of general considerations and approaches for early childhood curriculum, assessment, and evaluation, later chapters of the course will take a more in-depth look at appropriate curriculum for various age groups such as infants & toddlers, preschoolers, and primary school children. Curricular considerations for integrating specific content areas such as language and literacy, math and science, and social studies and expressive arts will also be discussed.
Each chapter contains additional handouts or attachments that cover specific topics from the chapter in greater depth. They are provided for you to read, ponder, and apply to the early childhood education setting in which you work. Some of the topics are intended for you, as the professional, while others are intended for you to pass on to parents, when appropriate.
As a student you will be expected to:
· Complete all four information sections showing a competent understanding of the material presented in each section.
· Complete all four section examinations, showing a competent understanding of the material presented. You must obtain an overall score of 70% or higher, with no individual exam score below 50%, and successfully complete ALL writing assignments to pass this course. *Please note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university; therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your minimum exam score requirements are.
· Complete a review of any section on which your examination score was below 50%.
· Retake any examination, after completing an information review, to increase that examination score to a minimum of 50%, making sure to also be achieving an overall exam score of a minimum 70% (maximum of three attempts). *Please note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by college or university; therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to determine what your minimum exam score requirements are.
· Complete all course journal article and essay writing assignments with the minimum word count shown for each writing assignment.
· Complete a course evaluation form at the end of the course.
At the end of each course chapter, you will be expected to complete an examination designed to assess your knowledge. You may take these exams a total of three times. Your last score will save, not the highest score. After your third attempt, each examination will lock and not allow further access. The average from your exam scores will be printed on your certificate. However, this is not your final grade since your required writing assignments have not been reviewed. Exceptionally written or poorly written required writing assignments, or violation of the academic integrity policy in the course syllabus, will affect your grade. As this is a self-paced computerized instruction program, you may review course information as often as necessary. You will not be able to exit any examinations until you have answered all questions. If you try to exit the exam before you complete all questions, your information will be lost. You are expected to complete the entire exam in one sitting.
All assignments are reviewed and may impact your final grade. Exceptionally or poorly written assignments, or violation of the Academic Integrity Policy (see course syllabus for policy), will affect your grade. Fifty percent of your grade is determined by your writing assignments, and your overall exam score determines the other fifty percent. Refer to the Essay Grading Guidelines which were sent as an attachment with your original course link. You should also refer to the Course Syllabus Addendum which was sent as an attachment with your original course link, to determine if you have any writing assignments in addition to the Critical Thinking Questions (CTQ) and Journal Article Summations (JAS). If you do, the Essay Grading Guidelines will also apply.
Your writing assignments must meet the minimum word count and are not to include the question or your final citations as part of your word count. In other words, the question and citations are not to be used as a means to meet the minimum word count.
There are four CTQs that you are required to complete. You will need to write a minimum of 500 words (maximum 1,000) per essay. You should explain how the information that you gained from the course will be applied and clearly convey a strong understanding of the course content as it relates to each CTQ. To view the questions, click on REQUIRED ESSAY and choose the CTQ that you are ready to complete; this will bring up a screen where you may enter your essay. Prior to course submission, you may go back at any point to edit your essay, but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits.
You must click SAVE before you write another essay or move on to another part of the course.
You are required to write, in your own words, a summary on a total of three peer-reviewed or scholarly journal articles (one article per JAS), written by an author with a Ph.D., Ed.D. or similar, on the topic outlined within each JAS section in the “Required Essays” portion of the course (blogs, abstracts, news articles or similar are not acceptable). Your article choice must relate specifically to the discussion topic listed in each individual JAS. You will choose a total of three relevant articles (one article per JAS) and write a thorough summary of the information presented in each article (you must write a minimum of 200 words with a 400-word maximum per JAS). Be sure to provide the URL or the journal name, volume, date, and any other critical information to allow the facilitator to access and review each article.
To write your summary, click on REQUIRED ESSAYS and choose the JAS that you would like to complete. A writing program will automatically launch where you can write your summary. When you are ready to stop, click SAVE. Prior to course submission you may go back at any point to edit your summaries, but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits. For more information on the features of this assignment, please consult the HELP menu.
You must click SAVE before you write another summary or move on to another part of the course.
Early Childhood: Program Planning has been developed by Aumony Dahl, MS/ED, the instructor of record. Aumony received her Master’s degree in Exceptional Children from Western Washington University. She is certified to teach in K–12 Special Education with an additional endorsement in Early Childhood Special Education. Aumony began her career working as an elementary special education teacher for several years. She is currently an instructor in the Special Education Department at Western Washington University—teaching a variety of classes on topics related to early childhood special education, students with complex special needs, assessment and evaluation, and program planning. Aumony also enjoys her role as a supervisor for practicum students who are training to become teachers. In addition to this course, Aumony has authored two other courses in this Early Childhood series, called Early Childhood: Family-Centered Services and Early Childhood: Infant & Toddler Mental Health.
Dr. Marrea Winnega, is a Licensed Clinical Psychologist with 20 years of experience in the field of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Currently, she is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology in the University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Psychiatry. She consults for schools and agencies serving individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders, including Asperger’s Disorder. She has also conducted numerous workshops, in-services, and trainings throughout the United States. Please contact Professor Dahl if you have course content or examination questions.
You may contact the facilitator by emailing Professor Dahl at firstname.lastname@example.org or calling her at 509-891-7219, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. PST. Phone messages will be answered within 24 hours. Phone conferences will be limited to ten minutes per student, per day, given that this is a self-paced instructional program. Please do not contact the instructor about technical problems, course glitches or other issues that involve the operation of the course. Please contact Professor Dahl if you have course content or examination questions.
If you have questions or problems related to the operation of this course, please try everything twice. If the problem persists please check our support pages for FAQs and known issues at www.virtualeduc.com and also the Help section of your course.
If you need personal assistance then email email@example.com or call (509) 891-7219. When contacting technical support, please know your course version number (it is located at the bottom left side of the Welcome Screen) and your operating system, and be seated in front of the computer at the time of your call.
Please refer to VESi’s website: www.virtualeduc.com or contact VESi if you have further questions about the compatibility of your operating system.
Refer to the addendum regarding Grading Criteria, Course Completion Information, Items to be Submitted and how to submit your completed information. The addendum will also note any additional course assignments that you may be required to complete that are not listed in this syllabus.
Bennett-Armistead, V. S., Duke, N. K, & Moses, A. M. (2005). Literacy and the youngest learner: Best practices for educators of children from birth to 5. Scholastic.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Pembroke.
Burgstahler, S. (2008). Universal design in education: Principles and applications. http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Academics/ud_edu.html
Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. NSTA Press.
Calkins, L. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Exeter, NH: Heinemann. New York: Longman.
Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2018). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science.
CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.0. Author.
CAST. (2009). What is Universal Design for Learning? https://www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl
Chaille, C., & Britain, L. (1997). The young child as scientist: A constructivist approach to early childhood science education (2nd ed.). Harper Collins.
Clay, M. (1998). By different paths to common outcomes. Stenhouse.
Colbert, C. (1997). Visual arts in the developmentally appropriate integrated curriculum. In C. Hart, D. Burts, & R. Charlesworth (Eds.), Integrated curriculum and developmentally appropriate practice (pp. 201–224). State University of New York Press.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). NAEYC. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/topics/dap/preschoolers
Cross, C., Woods, T., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2010). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. WestEd.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Cook-Harvey, C. M. (2018, September). Educating the whole child: Improving school climate to support student success. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Educating_Whole_Child_REPORT.pdf
Division of Early Childhood (DEC). (2007). Promoting positive outcomes for children with disabilities: Recommendations for curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Author.
DEC/NAEYC. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). http://www.dec-sped.org/papers
Dickinson, D. K., & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2). Guilford.
Dinnebeil, L. A., Boat, M., & Youlmi, B. (2013). Integrating principles of UDL into the early childhood curriculum. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 41(1). https://fpg.unc.edu/sites/fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/presentations-and-webinars/Dimensions_Vol41_1_Dinnebeil-1.pdf
Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
Dodge, D. T. (2010). The creative curriculum for preschool, Volume 1: The foundation. Teaching Strategies.
Epstein, A. S. (2014). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for children’s learning (Rev. ed.) National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Epstein, A. S. (2006). Essentials of active learning in preschool: Getting to know the high/scope curriculum. High/Scope Press.
Epstein, A. S., Schweinhart, L. J., & McAdoo, L. (1996). Models of early childhood education. High/Scope Press.
Gabbard, C. (1992). Lifelong motor development. Brown.
Goffin, S. G., & Wilson, C. (2001). Curriculum models and early childhood education: Appraising the relationship (2nd ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Hall, T., Vue, G., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2004). Differentiated Instruction and Implications for UDL Implementation. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. (Links updated 2014). National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. (Links updated 2014). https://sde.ok.gov/sites/ok.gov.sde/files/DI_UDL.pdf
Hall, T., & Vue, G. (2004). Explicit instruction. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. (Links updated 2014). https://www.cast.org/products-services/resources/2002/ncac-explicit-instruction
International Reading Association [IRA]. (2004). Preschool literacy collection (five books). Author.
Jones, E., & Nimmo, J. (1994). Emergent curriculum. National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Kostelnik, M., Soderman, A., & Whiren, A. (1999). Developmentally appropriate curriculum: Best practices in early childhood education. Merrill.
Kreidler, W. (1984). Creative conflict resolution. Scott Foresman.
Krogh, S., & Slentz, K. (2001). The early childhood curriculum. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lerner, C., & Barr, R. (2014). Screen sense: Setting the record straight: Research-based guidelines for screen use for children under 3 years old. Zero to Three. https://www.zerotothree.org/resources/1200-screen-sense-full-white-paper
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST.
Miller, L. (2011). Theories and approaches to learning in the early years. Sage.
Morrow, L. (1993). Literacy development in the early years. Allyn & Bacon.
NAEYC. (2009). Position statement on developmentally appropriate practice. http://www.naeyc.org/positionstatements/dap
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019). Vibrant and healthy kids: Aligning science, practice, and policy to advance health equity. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25466
National Association for the Education of Young Children [NAEYC]. (1998). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. Young Children, 53(4), 30–46.
National Association for the Education of Young Children [NAEYC] and National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education [NAECS/SDE]. (2003). Early childhood curriculum, child assessment, and program evaluation: building an accountable and effective system for children birth through age eight. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.199.4536&rep=rep1&type=pdf
National Association for the Education of Young Children [NAEYC] and National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education [NAECS/SDE]. (2009). Where we stand on curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. NAEYC. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/StandCurrAss.pdf
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2017). Mathematics in early childhood learning.
National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6160
National Research Council. (2000). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9745/eager-to-learn-educating-our-preschoolers
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K–12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Neuman, S. B., Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2000). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. NAEYC.
Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., Rose, T. (2018). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development. Applied Developmental Science.
P21 (Partnership for 21st Century Learning). (2015). Framework for 21st century learning. Author. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
Payne, A. A. (2018). Creating and sustaining a positive and communal school climate: Contemporary research, present obstacles, and future directions. National Institute of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250209.pdf
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. I, pp. 703–732). Wiley.
QRIS National Learning Network. (2015). QRIS state contacts & map. http://qrisnetwork.org/sites/all/files/maps/
Rose, E. (2010). The promise of preschool: From head start to universal prekindergarten. Oxford University Press.
Roskos, K. A., Tabors, P. O., & Lenhart, L. A. (2009). Oral language and early literacy in preschool. International Reading Association.
Rush, K. (2009). Building a high/scope program: Head Start preschool programs. High/Scope Press.
Schirrmacher, R. (1998). Art and creative development for young children. Delmar.
Sunal, C. (1990). Early childhood social studies. Merrill.
Tabors, P. O. (2008). One child, two languages: A guide for early childhood educators of children learning English as a second language (2nd ed.). Brookes.
Taylor, B. (1999). Science everywhere: Opportunities for very young children. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Tomlinson, C. A., Brimijoin, K., & Narvaez, L. (2008). The differentiated school: Making revolutionary changes in teaching and learning. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2016). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Tomlinson, C., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and Understanding by Design: Connecting content and kids. ASCD.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. https://tech.ed.gov/netp/
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017, January). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan update. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2011). The Understanding by Design guide to creating high-quality units. ASCD.
Wright, B. L. (2020). Now read this! Books that promote race, identity, agency, and voice. Teaching Young Children, 14(1).
Zigler, E., Singer, D., & Bishop-Josef, S. (Eds.). (2004). Children’s play: The roots of reading. Zero to Three.
American Academy of Pediatrics (http://www.aap.org)
American Institute for Research (https://www.air.org/)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (www.cdc.gov)
Center for Parent Information and Resources (http://www.parentcenterhub.org/)
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University (https://developingchild.harvard.edu/)
Council for Exceptional Children (http://www.cec.sped.org)
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) (https://www.ed.gov/essa?src=ft)
High/Scope Educational Research Foundation (http://www.highscope.org)
National Arts Education Association (http://www.arteducators.org/)
National Association for the Education of Young Children (http://naeyc.org)
National Association of Counsel for Children (http://www.naccchildlaw.org/)
National Center on Accessible Educational Materials (http://aem.cast.org/)
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (http://www.nctm.org/)
National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center (http://www.nectac.org)
National Ed Tech Plan (NETP) (https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf)
National Science Education Standards (https://www.nsta.org/science-and-children/science-and-children-julyaugust-2021-0/global-connections-0)
P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning: A Network of Battelle for Kids (https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21)
Technical Assistance Center on Social-Emotional Intervention for Young Children (http://challengingbehavior.fmhi.usf.edu/)
U.S. Department of Education–Early Learning (https://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/earlylearning/index.html)
Zero to Three Organization (http://www.zerotothree.org)
Course content is updated every three years. Due to this update timeline, some URL links may no longer be active or may have changed. Please type the title of the organization into the command line of any Internet browser search window and you will be able to find whether the URL link is still active or any new link to the corresponding organization’s web home page.