Understanding & Implementing Common Core Standards
Instructor Name: Dr.
Pamela Bernards, Ed.D.
Facilitator Name: Professor
Steven Dahl
Phone: 509-891-7219
Office Hours: 8
a.m. to 5 p.m. PST Monday – Friday
Email: steve_dahl@virtualeduc.com
Address: Virtual
Education Software
16201
E Indiana Ave, Suite 1450
Spokane,
WA 99216
Technical Support: support@virtualeduc.com
Welcome to Understanding & Implementing Common Core
Standards, an interactive computer-based instruction course designed to
give you a deeper understanding of the rationale for and structure of this particular standards-based framework. In this course you
will learn a number of factors that contributed to the overall design of the
Common Core Standards as well as practical pedagogical approaches that will
support practitioners working toward deeper implementation. We will reflect on the instructional “shifts”
emphasized throughout the Common Core Standards and contextualize the shifts
based on the diverse population of students course
participants serve. Understanding & Implementing Common Core
Standards will also provide connections to a variety of instructional
considerations that will support implementation regardless of educational
context. Practitioners will be provided
opportunities to reflect on current practice and the degree to which they align
with the Common Core Standards as well as with colleagues across a wide range
of settings implementing these standards.
This computer-based
instruction course is a self-supporting program that provides instruction,
structured practice, and evaluation all on your home or school computer. Technical support information can be found in
the Help section of your course.
Course Materials (Online)
Title: Understanding & Implementing
Common Core Standards
Instructor: Dr.
Pamela Bernards, Ed.D.
Facilitator: Professor
Steven Dahl
Publisher: Virtual Education Software, inc. 2014,
Revised 2016
Academic Work
Academic work submitted by
the individual (such as papers, assignments, reports, tests) shall be the
student’s own work or appropriately attributed, in part or in whole, to its correct
source. Submission of commercially prepared (or group prepared) materials as if
they are one’s own work is unacceptable.
Aiding Honesty in Others
The individual will encourage
honesty in others by refraining from providing materials or information to
another person with knowledge that these materials or information will be used
improperly.
Violations of these academic standards
will result in the assignment of a failing grade and subsequent loss of credit
for the course.
Level of Application
This course is designed for
anyone working to implement the Common Core State Standards with a diverse
learning population across the K-12 spectrum.
While the information presented may have relevance to any student-centered
educational setting, it will have the most relevance for K-12 mixed ability
classrooms.
Expected Learning Outcomes
As a result of this course, participants will demonstrate their
ability to:
This course, Understanding & Implementing Common Core
Standards, has been divided into four chapters. The organization of the course covers the
rationale for and design of the Common Core State Standards, the “Common Core
Mindset” practitioners need for successful implementation, and what specific
actions can be taken for deeper implementation across settings.
Chapter 1: Introduction
to the Shifts Resulting From CCSS Implementation
Chapter 2: Developing
a CCSS Mindset
Chapter 3: Common
Core Mindset in Action
Chapter 4: Thinking
Through the Core
In Chapter 2, we will move past the "what" of standards to
identify the underlying principles teachers need to understand when
implementing the CCSS. Teachers who take time to re-examine their operating
principles are in the best position to know how well their approach aligns with
what the authors of the CCSS had in mind when developing the standards. This is
what is referred to in this course as developing the “CCSS Mindset.” Clarification will be made between “rigor”
and “difficulty” and the implications will be discussed for teachers as they
work to create equitable learning conditions. We will also articulate the
difference between a “fixed” and a “growth” orientation and the implications of
each view for students and teachers. A self-assessment tool will be used so
course participants can determine the priority level to which course
participants and their students believe that ability is expandable. A
seven-step process for directly teaching students that ability is expandable is
also provided.
In Chapter 3, the emphasis will be on designing accessible learning
conditions in partnership with students.
We do this in partnership with learners in ways that will accelerate
their growth toward college, career, and citizenship. The various ways in which
student and teacher self-efficacy are interconnected will be discussed. In light of these
interconnections, a four-step process for articulating standards and increasing
student ownership over learning outcomes will be outlined. Additionally, the
purpose of and a process for providing effective prescriptive feedback will be
provided. As it pertains to the implementation of the Common Core Standards,
the significance of the emergence of educational neuroscience and corollary strategies
will be outlined. The importance of explicitly teaching academic language and
methods for increasing student ownership of learning across settings will also
be outlined. Participants will be supported to think through how they will
approach students who struggle when implementing the Common Core Standards and
the role of differentiation.
In Chapter 4, we will further explore how implementation of the Common
Core Standards is aimed at deepening student comprehension and higher order
thinking skills. The difference between a teaching strategy and a learning
strategy will be discussed in conjunction with a particular
implementation strategy, compare and contrast. Specific web-based tools for designing
engaging learning activities using primary source documents and for engaging
students in higher order thinking skills will be provided. The importance of student
use of reasoning and argument in writing across the CCSS is addressed. Course
participants will be provided a tool for further reflection on their own
implementation of the standards and support in planning for any changes
identified through reflection.
Each chapter contains
additional handouts that cover specific topics from the chapter in greater
depth. They are provided for you to read, ponder, and apply to the setting in
which you work. Some of the handouts are directly related to the concepts and
content of the specific chapter, but also included are handouts indirectly
related to provide extended learning connections.
Student Expectations
As a student
you will be expected to:
●
Complete all four information sections showing a
competent understanding of the material presented in each section.
●
Complete all four section examinations, showing a
competent understanding of the material presented. You
must obtain an overall score of 70%
or higher, with no individual exam score below 50%, and successfully
complete ALL writing assignments to pass this course. *Please note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by
college or university; therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to
determine what your minimum exam score requirements are.
●
Complete a review
of any section on which your examination score was below 50%.
●
Retake any examination, after completing an
information review, to increase that examination score to a minimum of 50%,
making sure to also be achieving an overall exam score of a minimum 70% (maximum of three attempts). *Please note: Minimum exam score requirements may vary by
college or university; therefore, you should refer to your course addendum to
determine what your minimum exam score requirements are.
●
Complete all
course journal article and essay writing assignments with the minimum word
count shown for each writing assignment.
●
Complete a course
evaluation form at the end of the course.
Examinations
At the end of each course
section, you will be expected to complete an examination designed to assess
your knowledge. You may take these exams a total of three times. Your last
score will save, not the highest score.
After your third attempt, each examination will lock and not allow
further access. The average from your
exam scores will be printed on your certificate. However, this is not your final grade since
your required writing assignments have not been reviewed. Exceptionally written or poorly written
required writing assignments, or violation of the academic integrity policy in
the course syllabus, will affect your grade.
As this is a self-paced computerized instruction program, you may review
course information as often as necessary. You will not be able to exit any
examinations until you have answered all questions. If you try to exit the exam
before you complete all questions, your information will be lost. You are
expected to complete the entire exam in one sitting.
Writing
Assignments
All
assignments are reviewed and may impact your final grade. Exceptionally or poorly written
assignments, or violation of the Academic Integrity Policy (see course syllabus
for policy), will affect your grade. Fifty percent of your grade is determined
by your writing assignments, and your overall exam score determines the other
fifty percent. Refer to the Essay Grading Guidelines which were sent as
an attachment with your original course link. You should also refer to the Course Syllabus Addendum which was sent as
an attachment with your original course link, to determine if you have any
writing assignments in addition to the Critical Thinking Questions (CTQ) and
Journal Article Summations (JAS). If you
do, the Essay Grading Guidelines will
also apply.
Your writing assignments must
meet the minimum word count and are not to include the question or your final
citations as part of your word count. In
other words, the question and citations are not to be used as
a means to meet the minimum word count.
Critical Thinking
Questions
There
are four CTQs that you are required to complete. You will need to write a minimum of 500
words (maximum 1,000) per essay. You should explain how the information
that you gained from the course will be applied and clearly convey a strong
understanding of the course content as it relates to each CTQ. To view the questions, click on REQUIRED
ESSAY and choose the CTQ that you are ready to complete; this will bring up a
screen where you may enter your essay.
Prior to course submission, you may go back at any point to edit your
essay, but you must be certain to click SAVE once you are done with your edits.
You
must click SAVE before you write another essay or move on to another part of
the course.
Journal Article
Summations
You
are required to write, in your own words, a summary on a total of three
peer-reviewed or scholarly journal articles (one article per JAS), written by
an author with a Ph.D., Ed.D. or similar, on the
topic outlined within each JAS section in the “Required Essays” portion of the course (blogs, abstracts, news articles or similar are
not acceptable). Your article choice must relate specifically to the discussion
topic listed in each individual JAS. You will choose a total of three
relevant articles (one article per JAS) and write a thorough summary
of the information presented in each article (you must write a minimum of 200 words with a
400 word maximum per JAS). Be sure to provide the URL or the journal name,
volume, date, and any other critical information to allow the facilitator to
access and review each article.
To write your summary, click on REQUIRED
ESSAYS and choose the JAS that you would like to complete. A writing program
will automatically launch where you can write your summary. When you are ready
to stop, click SAVE. Prior to course submission you may go back at
any point to edit your summaries but you must be certain to click SAVE once you
are done with your edits. For more information on the features of this
assignment, please consult the HELP menu.
You must click SAVE before you write another summary
or move on to another part of the course.
Understanding & Implementing Common Core Standards has been developed with the widest possible audience
in mind because the core principles and practices of implementation need to be
applied across K-12 settings. The primary goal of the course is to provide the
rationale for the Common Core Standards (the why) and what research-based
pedagogical approaches will help practitioners implement these standards in
their unique context. The course acknowledges that practitioners are at varying
stages of implementing these standards, so opportunities for self-reflection,
learning about cross-cutting implementation strategies, and action planning are
based on each course participant’s current practice and context.
Steve Dahl, the instructor of
record, has served as a district-level administrator overseeing a
variety of federal programs,
such as Special Education, English Language Learning (ELL), and Title 1, for
the past 10 years. He has a Master’s Degree in Special Education and has
completed post-Master’s coursework to obtain a Washington State Administrator
Credential which certifies him to oversee programs ranging from Preschool
settings through 12th grade (as well as post-secondary vocational
programs for 18-21 year old students). He has 22 years of combined experience in
resource-room special education classrooms, inclusion support in a
comprehensive high school, and provision of support to adults with disabilities
in accessing a wide range of in-school and community learning
opportunities. Please
contact Professor Dahl if you have course content or examination questions.
Pamela Bernards has 30 years
of combined experience in diverse PK–8 and high school settings as a teacher
and an administrator. In addition to
these responsibilities, she was the founding director of a K-8 after-school
care program and founder of a pre-school program for infants to 4-year-olds. As
a principal, her school was named a U.S. Department of Education Blue Ribbon
School of Excellence in 1992, as was the school at which she served as
curriculum coordinator in 2010. She currently serves as a principal in a
PK3–Grade 8 school. Areas of interest include curriculum, research-based
teaching practices, staff development, assessment, data-driven instruction, and
instructional intervention (remediation and gifted/talented). She received a
doctorate in Leadership and Professional Practice from Trevecca Nazarene
University. Please contact Professor Dahl if you have
course content or examination questions.
You
may contact the facilitator by emailing Professor Dahl at steve_dahl@virtualeduc.com or calling him at 509-891-7219, Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. PST. Phone messages will be answered within 24
hours. Phone conferences will be
limited to ten minutes per student, per day, given that this is a self-paced
instructional program. Please do not contact the instructor about technical
problems, course glitches, or other issues that involve the operation of the
course.
Technical Questions
If you have questions or problems related to the
operation of this course, please try everything twice. If the problem persists
please check our support pages for FAQs and known issues at www.virtualeduc.com and also the Help section of
your course.
If you
need personal assistance then email support@virtualeduc.com or call (509) 891-7219. When contacting technical support, please
know your course version number (it is located at the bottom left side of the
Welcome Screen) and your operating system, and be seated in front of the
computer at the time of your call.
Minimum Computer Requirements
Please refer to VESi’s
website: www.virtualeduc.com or contact VESi if you have further questions about
the compatibility of your operating system.
Refer to the addendum
regarding Grading Criteria, Course Completion Information, Items to be
Submitted and how to submit your completed information. The addendum will also
note any additional course assignments that you may be required to complete
that are not listed
in this syllabus.
Bibliography (Suggested
Readings)
Achieve the
Core developed by Student Achievement Partners
Free,
ready-to-use classroom resources designed to help educators understand and
implement the Common Core and other college and career ready standards
Coherence Map for Common Core State Standards in Mathematics
http://achievethecore.org/page/1118/coherence-map
Deep Dive Into the Math Shifts
http://achievethecore.org/page/400/deep-dive-into-the-math-shifts
Instructional Practice Toolkit and Classroom Videos
The Instructional Practice Toolkit is designed for use by
teachers and those who support teachers to build understanding and experience
with instruction aligned to College and Career Readiness (CCR) standards in
mathematics and ELA/literacy.
http://achievethecore.org/category/1193/instructional-practice-toolkit-and-classroom-videos
Lesson Planning Resources
Rather than focusing exclusively on literacy skills, the
Common Core State Standards set expectations for the complexity of
texts students need to be able to read to be ready for college and
careers. This collection includes tools to help with each step and
research to support teachers' understanding of text complexity. To
plan a close-reading lesson with text complexity in mind, use the Lesson Planning Tool.
http://achievethecore.org/lesson-planning-tool/
Progressions Documents for the Common Core State Standards
for Mathematics
Recognize Alignment
Deepen your knowledge of the Shifts and Standards; learn what
to look for in aligned materials.
http://achievethecore.org/aligned/category/recognize-alignment/
Understand How CCSS Aligned Assessment is Different
All of the mini-assessments presented are
designed to highlight the math Shifts of Focus, Coherence, and Rigor. The
resources below explain what each of the Shifts look like in CCSS-aligned
assessment. Learn more about the math Shifts.
http://achievethecore.org/page/2732/understand-how-ccss-aligned-assessment-is-different
Understand the Common Core State Standards Shifts in Mathematics
http://achievethecore.org/page/900/the-common-core-state-standards-shifts-in-mathematics
Understand the Mathematics Tasks
http://achievethecore.org/page/2738/understand-the-mathematics-tasks
Understanding the Shifts
http://achievethecore.org/category/419/the-shifts
American
Federation of Teachers (2016). A Teacher’s Guide to the Common Core: A Resource
Guide for Success in English Language Arts for Teachers Who Work with English
Learners and Students with Disabilities
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook
1. New York, NY: David McKay.
Brookhart, S. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom.
Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Brophy, J. (1998, May). Failure syndrome students. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from http://ecap.crc.illinois.edu
/eecearchive/digests/1998/brophy98.pdf
California’s Department of Education. (n.d.). Resilience—Strengthening
protective factors and developmental assets. Retrieved from http://pubs.cde.ca.gov/tcsii/ch8/resilience.aspx
Common Core State Standards
National Governors Association
Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers Title: Common
Core State Standards. Publisher: National Governors Association Center for Best
Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. Copyright
Date: 2010
Myths vs. Facts
http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/myths-vs-facts/
Read the ELA Standards
The Common Core State Standards for
English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and
Technical Subjects (“the standards”) represent the next generation of K–12
standards designed to prepare all students for success in college, career, and
life by the time they graduate from high school.
http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
Read the Mathematics Standards
http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
Read the Standards
http://www.corestandards.org/read-the-standards/
Standards in Your State
http://www.corestandards.org/standards-in-your-state/
What Parents Should Know
http://www.corestandards.org/what-parents-should-know/
CCSSO
General Resources
Common Core Implementation Video
Series
To further aid states as they
continue to implement the Common Core State Standards (Standards), the Hunt
Institute and the Council of Chief State School Officers have commissioned a
series of video vignettes that explain the Standards in far greater depth.
http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Digital_Resources/Common_Core_Implementation_Video_Series.html
The Common Core State Standards:
Supporting Districts and Teachers with Text Complexity
Provides states with additional Common Core State Standards implementation
support, the Council of Chief State School Officers hosted a one-hour webinar to share tools and resources to support teachers and
districts on text complexity, which is the linchpin of the ELA standards. The webinar featured Sue Pimentel, a member of the Common Core
State Standards English language arts writing committee, as well as
representatives from the Kansas and Louisiana Departments of Education.
Common Core Webinar Series
http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Digital_Resources/Common_Core_Webinar_Series.html
Joint Webinar CCSSO and ASCD on EduCore
Mathematics Common Core Standards
and the Concept of Focus
CSSO hosted a webinar on the Common Core mathematics
standards. The webinar included a presentation on the
concept of focus in the Math standards, the work of the Math SCASS, and
information on the Illustrative Mathematics Project.
http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Digital_Resources/Mathematics_Common_Core_Standards_Webinar.html
Resources from the Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO) on Navigating Text Complexity
Chart
Your Course
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity/Chart_Your_Course.html
Explore Text Roadmaps
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity/Explore_Text_Roadmaps.html
Finding
State Resources to Implement the Common Core
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity/Find_State_Resources_to_Support_Your_Journey_.html
Infographics, Posters and Foldable
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity/Infographics_Posters_and_Foldable.html
Learning the Ropes
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity/Learn_the_Ropes.html
Navigating
Text Complexity
Website created by ELA State Collaborative on Assessment and
Student Standards that includes resources for evaluating text complexity, model
text roadmaps (comprehensive text complexity analyses), and model text sets
(backbones for units of instruction). (Retrieved
July 2017)
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity.html
Support Students
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity/Support_Students.html
Trouble
Shooting Text Complexity
http://www.ccsso.org/Navigating_Text_Complexity/Troubleshooting_Text_Complexity.html
Dweck, C. (2010). Even
geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 16-20. Alexandria, VA:
ASCD.
EduCore (ASCD, Free Resources to Implement
the Common Core)
EngageNY (New York State Common Core State Standards)
https://www.engageny.org/common-core-curriculum
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2012). Text complexity: Raising rigor in reading.
Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Francis, E. (2016). Now that’s a good
question! How to promote cognitive rigor through classroom questioning.
Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Frizell, M., & Dunderdale,
T. (2015). A Compendium of Research on the Common Core State Standards. Center
for Education Policy.
This updated compendium includes over 85 research studies
focused on the Common Core State Standards, and encompasses research from multiple
sources, such as government entities, independent organizations, and
peer-reviewed publications from academic journals and other outlets. Each study
in the compendium has been summarized and categorized across nine topic areas.
A URL link to the original research is also provided when possible. The
compendium is presented below both as a single document as well as individual
PDFs of the nine topic areas. The compendium will be updated regularly as the
body of CCSS-related research grows. This latest version is updated as of
February 10, 2015.
https://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=438
Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter
more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam.
Goleman, D. (2007). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New
York, NY: Bantam.
Hillocks, G. (2011). Teaching argument writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hull, T. H., Miles, R. E. H., & Balkan, D. S.
(2012). The Common Core mathematics
practices: Transforming practices through team leadership. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Corwin.
International
Reading Association Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Committee. (2012). Literacy implementation guidance for the ELA
Common Core State Standards [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/Libraries/association-documents/ira_ccss_guidelines.pdf
Jennings, J. (2012). Why have we fallen short and
where do we go from here? Center for Educational Policy. Retrieved
from http://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=392
Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based
learning: The new paradigm of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Corwin.
Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. (2009). Immunities to change. Boston, MA:
Harvard Business Press.
Marzano, R. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research
into action. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for
effective teaching. Alexandria, VA:
ASCD.
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Heflebower,
T. (2011). The highly engaged classroom.
Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Medina, J. (2008) Brain
rules. Seattle, WA: Pear Press.
Moss, C., & Brookhart, S. (2012). Learning targets: Helping students aim for
understanding in today’s lesson. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Oregon Department of Education. (n.d.).
Apply the concepts. Retrieved from
http://oregonliteracypd.uoregon.edu/topic/academic-language
Partnership for Assessment of
Readiness for College and Careers (PAARC)
Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley
and Sons.
Reeves, D. (2010). Transforming
professional development into student results. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Reeves, D., Wiggs, M., Lassiter, C., Piercy, T.,
Ventura, S., & Bell, B. (2011). Navigating
implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Lead and Learn Press.
Schlechty, P. (2011). Engaging
students: The next level of working on the work. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Schmoker, M. (2011). Focus:
Elevating the essentials to radically improve student learning. Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
Silver, H., Dewing, R., & Perini, M. (2012). The core six: Essential strategies for
achieving excellence with the Common Core. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Smarter
Balanced Assessment Consortium
http://www.smarterbalanced.org/about/
Resources for Educators
http://www.smarterbalanced.org/educators/
Sousa, D. (2010). Mind,
brain, and education: Neuroscience implications for the classroom.
Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Sousa, D. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). Differentiation and the brain: How
neuroscience supports the learner-friendly classroom. Bloomington, IN:
Solution Tree Press.
Stiggins, R., & Chappuis,
J. (2008, January). Enhancing student
learning. Retrieved from
http://dr078.k12.sd.us/Library/PLC%20Resources/Enhancing%20Student%20Learning%20Through%20Formative%20Assessment.pdf
Swinney, R., & Velasco, P. (2011). Connecting content and academic language for
English learners and struggling students grades 2-6. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Corwin.
Tomlinson, C. & Imbeau, M. (2014). A differentiated approach to the Common
Core: how do I help a broad range of learners succeed with challenging
curriculum? Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). School connectedness. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/protective/connectedness.htm
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education
Sciences. TIMSS 2007 results. National
Center for Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS). Retrieved
from https://nces.ed.gov/timss/results07.asp
University of Oregon’s Brain Development Lab. (2008). Changing brains: Effects of experience on
human brain development [DVD]. Available from www.changingbrains.org
Webb, N. (2002) Depth of knowledge (DOK) levels in 4 content
areas. Retrieved from
http://facstaff.wcer.wisc.edu/normw/state%20alignment%20page%20one.htm
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded
formative assessment. Bloomington,
IN: Solution Tree Press.
Willis, J. (2006). Research-based
strategies to ignite student learning: Insights from a neurologist and
classroom teacher. Alexandria,VA:
ASCD.
Wormelli, M. (2006). Fair
Isn’t Always Equal: Assessing and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom.
Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
Zwiers, J. and Crawford, M. (2011).
Academic Conversations: classroom
talk that fosters critical thinking and content understandings. Portland,
ME: Stenhouse.
Course content is updated every three
years. Due to this update timeline, some URL links may no longer be active or
may have changed. Please type the title of the organization into the command
line of any Internet browser search window and you will be able to find whether
the URL link is still active or any new link to the corresponding
organization's web home page.
7/18/17
jn